Iraq and the fig-leaf of just war theory

Discussing the Chilcot Inquiry into the invasion and occupation of Iraq on BBC Radio 5 on 20 January this year, John Rentoul, quoting Nick Cohen, challenged ‘the anti-war mob’, and more specifically Philippe Sands, to tell him how any war could be ‘illegal’. Cohen, like Rentoul, is an apologist for the Iraq War, petulant about critics who insist it was illegal. His petulance, elaborated in the article quoted below, is rooted in his (entirely correct) insistence that the murderous Sadaam Hussein regime was itself acting in ways which were plainly illegal. But my concern isn’t with whether two wrongs make a right. Rather it’s with Cohen’s ‘simple question’:

I am growing old and grey waiting for John Humphrys or Jon Snow to show a spark of journalistic life and ask Nick Clegg, Philippe Sands and all the rest of them the simple question: "What do you mean by an 'illegal war'?"

Read more >> | openDemocracy

Labels: Irak onderzoek, Iraq, Iraq Inquiry Chilcot, Just War, United Kingdom

- posted by DD @ 11:02 a.m. Perma Link/Print  

0 reacties:

Een reactie posten

Aanmelden bij Reacties posten [Atom]

Op dit werk is een Creative Commons Licentie van toepassing.